1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 998 F.Supp.
  5. 998 F.Supp. 478 (1998)
 

POUST v. HUNTLEIGH HEALTHCARE

Civil Action No. 94-6063 (MLC).

998 F.Supp. 478 (1998)

William POUST and Kimberly Poust, Plaintiffs, v. HUNTLEIGH HEALTHCARE, Defendant.

United States District Court, D. New Jersey.

March 30, 1998.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

William A. Loftus, Shager, McDaid, Loftus, Flum & Spivey, Philadelphia, PA, for Plaintiffs.

Thomas J. Herten, Jason T. Shaffron, Herten, Burstein, Sheridan, Cevasco, Bottinelli & Litt, L.L.C., Hackensack, NJ, for Defendant.

MEMORANDUM OPINION

COOPER, District Judge.

There are two motions before the Court in this matter: (1) defendant Huntleigh Healthcare's ("Huntleigh") motion for summary judgment pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 56; and (2) plaintiffs, William and Kimberly Pousts' motion in limine for an Order applying Pennsylvania law on the issue of the calculation of damages. The Court held a Federal Rule of Evidence 104 hearing on defendant's motion for summary...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases