1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 994 F.Supp.
  5. 994 F.Supp. 344 (1998)
 

YELLOW CAB CO. OF PITTSBURGH v. GASPER

No. CIV. A. 97-1390.

994 F.Supp. 344 (1998)

YELLOW CAB COMPANY OF PITTSBURGH, a Corporation, Plaintiff, v. Carl GASPER, an Individual, Gasper Transportation Company, a Corporation, Carriage Limousine Service, a Corporation, Landmark Transportation Services, Inc., a Corporation, Defendants.

United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania.

February 9, 1998.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Dorothy A. Davis, Herbert B. Conner, Buchanan Ingersoll, Pittsburgh, PA, for Plaintiff.

Richard F. Andracki, Jones, Gregg, Creehan & Gerace, Pittsburgh, PA, Dennis J. Kusturiss, William A. Gray, Vuono, Lavelle & Gray, Pittsburgh, PA, for Defendants.

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

D. BROOKS SMITH, District Judge.

This is a trademark and unfair competition dispute between Yellow Cab Company and one of its competitors. It arises largely out of a television commercial which depicted passengers in a Yellow Cab being subjected to an unpleasant, unsafe and untimely journey while passengers in the competitor's limousine enjoyed a safe, comfortable, luxurious trip. Yellow Cab filed suit in the Court of...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases