1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.2d
  4. 7 F.Supp.2d
  5. 7 F.Supp.2d 119 (1998)
 

CDC TECHNOLOGIES, INC. v. IDEXX LABORATORIES, INC.

Civ. No. 3:95CV339(JBA).

7 F.Supp.2d 119 (1998)

CDC TECHNOLOGIES, INC., Plaintiff, v. IDEXX LABORATORIES, INC., Defendant.

United States District Court, D. Connecticut.

March 31, 1998.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Michael R. Borasky of Eckert, Seamans, Cherin & Mellott, Pittsburgh, PA, for Plaintiff.

David H. Erichsen of Hale & Dorr, Boston, MA, for Defendant.

RULING ON PLAINTIFF'S OBJECTION TO RECOMMENDED RULING [doc. 73]

ARTERTON, District Judge.

In a March 12, 1998 Recommended Ruling, Magistrate Judge Garfinkel recommended that defendant IDEXX Laboratories, Inc.'s ("IDEXX") motion for summary judgment be granted because plaintiff failed to demonstrate that IDEXX's exclusive dealing contract at the distributor level impeded plaintiff CDC Technologies, Inc.'s ("CDC") ability to reach the ultimate customers of...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases