1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.2d
  4. 17 F.Supp.2d
  5. 17 F.Supp.2d 104 (1998)
 

EDBERG v. NEOGEN CORP.

No. 3:98CV00717 (GLG).

17 F.Supp.2d 104 (1998)

Stephen C. EDBERG, Stephen C. Wardlaw, and IDEXX Laboratories, Inc., Plaintiffs, v. NEOGEN CORPORATION, Defendant.

United States District Court, D. Connecticut.

August 4, 1998.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mary S. Consalvi, Lyon & Lyon LLP, La Jolla, CA, Thomas J. Rechen, Pepe & Hazard LLP, Hartford, CT, for Plaintiffs.

Mark R. Fox, Fraser Trebilcock Davis & Foster, P.C., Lansing, MI, Edward R. Scofield, Zeldes, Needle & Cooper, P.C., Bridgeport, CT, for Defendant.

OPINION

GOETTEL, District Judge.

This is a patent and trade dress infringement case, in which the defendant, Neogen Corporation, has filed a motion to dismiss on the ground of lack of personal jurisdiction. Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(2). Defendant, a foreign corporation, asserts that the requirements for personal jurisdiction have not been met by virtue of a single sale of its product in the forum state, which was orchestrated by the plaintiff, IDEXX Laboratories...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases