1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Ohio
  4. 82 Ohio
  5. 82 Ohio St.3d 34 (1998)
 

STATE EX REL. TOLEDO BLADE CO. v. BD. OF COMMRS.

No. 97-1013.

82 Ohio St.3d 34 (1998)

THE STATE EX REL. THE TOLEDO BLADE COMPANY v. BOARD OF HANCOCK COUNTY COMMISSIONERS.

Supreme Court of Ohio.

Decided May 20, 1998.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Fritz Byers, for relator.

Robert A. Fry, Hancock County Prosecuting Attorney, for respondent.

Baker & Hostetler LLP, David L. Marburger and Beth A. Brandon, urging issuance of the writ for amicus curiae, Ohio Coalition for Open Government.

Per Curiam.

R.C. 149.43; Mandamus

The Blade initially requested a writ of mandamus to compel the board to provide access to the settlement agreement. Mandamus is the appropriate remedy to compel compliance with R.C. 149.43. State ex rel. Steckman v. Jackson (1994), 70 Ohio St.3d 420, 426-427, 639 N.E.2d 83, 89.

As The Blade concedes, its mandamus claim is moot because the board...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases