RATLIFF v. DeMARINIS

94-1672-L-6; CA A96330.

954 P.2d 209 (1998)

152 Or. App. 269

Sandra RATLIFF, Appellant, v. Susan DeMARINIS, D.C., Defendant, and Jeff Nelson, D.C., Respondent.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Decided February 4, 1998.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Thomas C. Howser, Ashland, argued the cause for appellant. On the brief was Robert W. Good.

Paul L. Roess, Portland, argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief were Frank A. Moscato and Moscato, Skopil & Hallock.

Before RIGGS, P.J., and LANDAU and LEESON, JJ.


RIGGS, Presiding Judge.

Plaintiff filed a chiropractic malpractice claim in circuit court. Following trial, the jury returned a verdict for defendant. This appeal arises out of plaintiff's subsequent motion to examine two of the jurors who were on the panel to determine whether there was an improper communication between the court and the jury while the jury was deliberating. Plaintiff appeals from an order of the trial court denying the motion. We reverse.

...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases