EMMENEGGER v. BULL MOOSE TUBE CO.

No. 4:96CV1095 CDP.

33 F.Supp.2d 1123 (1998)

Charles E. EMMENEGGER, et al., Plaintiffs, v. BULL MOOSE TUBE COMPANY, et al., Defendants.

United States District Court, E.D. Missouri, Eastern Division.

November 12, 1998.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

David W. Harlan, Partner, Melanie R. King, Gallop and Johnson, St. Louis, MO, for Charles E. Emmenegger, Robert F. Ritzie, James E. Riley.

James R. Dankenbring, Partner, Francis E. Pennington, III, Partner, Thomas W. Jerry, Francis X. Neuner, Jr., Dankenbring and Greiman, Clayton, MO, for Bull Moose Tube Company, Caparo, Inc., Bull Moose Tube, Ltd., Swraj Paul.


MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

PERRY, District Judge.

This matter is before the Court on the parties' motions to correct errors in the judgment pursuant to Rule 60(a), Fed.R.Civ.P. The Court will grant the motions to the extent set forth below, and will enter an amended judgment to account therefor.

I. Background

In accordance with a memorandum opinion that it entered on July 20, 1998, and on that same date, the Court entered...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases