1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.2d
  4. 34 F.Supp.2d
  5. 34 F.Supp.2d 1098 (1998)
 

BRADDOCK v. MADISON COUNTY, IND.

No. IP 96-1233-C H/G.

34 F.Supp.2d 1098 (1998)

Helen Jean BRADDOCK, Karen J. McCord, Mary M. Martin, and David M. Surratt, Plaintiffs, v. MADISON COUNTY, Indiana, Defendant.

United States District Court, S.D. Indiana, Indianapolis Division.

November 30, 1998.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Arend J. Abel, Leagre, Chandler & Millard, Indianapolis, IN, for Plaintiffs.

David A. Gunter, Beers, Mallers, Backs & Salin, Fort Wayne, IN, for Defendant.

Wayne Uhl, Office of the Indiana Attorney General, Indianapolis, IN, for State.

FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW

HAMILTON, District Judge.

Introduction

Three court reporters and a former bailiff with the Unified Courts of Madison County seek additional compensation from Madison County, Indiana, for hours the plaintiffs worked beyond the minimum scheduled 35 hours a week each was expected to work. The case was tried to the court. Findings of fact and conclusions of law are set forth in this entry.

Plaintiffs...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases