1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.2d
  4. 43 F.Supp.2d
  5. 43 F.Supp.2d 1088 (1998)
 

ARNETTE OPTIC ILLUSIONS v. ITT HARTFORD GROUP

No. CV 98-1740 CM MANX.

43 F.Supp.2d 1088 (1998)

ARNETTE OPTIC ILLUSIONS, INC., and Gregory Arnette, Plaintiffs, v. ITT HARTFORD GROUP, INC. and Hartford Insurance Company of the Midwest, Defendants. And Related Counterclaims

United States District Court, C.D. California.

Order Denying Reconsideration February 16, 1999.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

David Hinshaw and T.A. Taurino, Gansinger & Hinshaw, L.L.P, Los Angeles, CA, for Plaintiffs.

Stephen J. Erigero, Ropers, Majeski, Kohn & Bentley, Los Angeles, CA, for Defendants.

ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART PLAINTIFFS' MOTION FOR SUMMARY ADJUDICATION; DENYING DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY ADJUDICATION (RE POUILLOUX); AND GRANTING DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY ADJUDICATION (RE OAKLEY)

MORENO, District Judge.

The Court, having considered all papers and admissible evidence filed in connection with Plaintiffs' Motion for Summary Adjudication, Defendant's Motion for Summary Adjudication (Re Pouilloux Action...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases