1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. P.2d
  4. 963 P.2d
  5. 963 P.2d 116 (1998)
 

JEBOUSEK v. CITY OF NEWPORT

97-182; CA A101951.

963 P.2d 116 (1998)

155 Or. App. 365

Nyla L. JEBOUSEK, Petitioner, v. CITY OF NEWPORT, Respondent.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Decided August 5, 1998.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Nyla L. Jebousek, Springfield, argued the cause and filed the brief pro se for petitioner.

Elizabeth A. Fetsch, Newport, argued the cause for respondent. With her on the brief was Minor & Boone, P.C.

Before De MUNIZ, P.J., DEITS, C.J., and HASELTON, J.

De MUNIZ, Presiding Judge.

Petitioner seeks review of LUBA's decision affirming a lot line adjustment that the City of Newport allowed to facilitate the development of a planned residence on property near petitioner's. This matter was before us previously in Jebousek v. City of Newport, 147 Or.App. 100, 935 P.2d 452 (1997), where we remanded for further consideration of the effect, if any...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases