1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.2d
  4. 720 A.2d
  5. 720 A.2d 335 (1998)
 

LAUFGAS v. NEW JERSEY TURNPIKE AUTH.

720 A.2d 335 (1998)

156 N.J. 436

Bernard LAUFGAS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. NEW JERSEY TURNPIKE AUTHORITY, New Jersey Highway Authority and New Jersey State Police, Defendants-Respondents.

Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Decided November 19, 1998.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Bernard Laufgas, plaintiff-appellant, pro se.

Stuart M. Lederman, Morristown, for defendant-respondent New Jersey Turnpike Authority (Riker, Danzig, Scherer, Hyland & Perretti, attorneys).

Andrew Bayer, Teaneck, for defendants-respondents New Jersey Highway Authority and New Jersey State Police (DeCotiis, Fitzpatrick & Gluck, attorneys).

PER CURIAM.

This appeal is before us as of right under Rule 2:2-1(a)(2) on the basis of a dissent in the Appellate Division. The dissent expressly limited itself to "but one aspect of the well-reasoned majority opinion" that affirmed the dismissal of plaintiff's complaint.

In early 1995, plaintiff requested from the New Jersey Turnpike Authority (the Turnpike) and the New Jersey Highway Authority (the Parkway) approximately fifteen years of records...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases