BERMEL v. AUGE

No. C5-97-1833.

574 N.W.2d 460 (1998)

Troy BERMEL, Respondent, v. Brian AUGE, Appellant.

Court of Appeals of Minnesota.

February 24, 1998.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Sean M. Quinn, Robert C. Falsani, Falsani, Balmer, Berglund & Peterson, Duluth, David J. Moskal, Schwebel, Goetz, Sieben & Moskal, P.A., Minneapolis, for respondent.

John D. Kelly, Kathleen S. Bray, Hanft, Fride, O'Brien, Harries, Swelbar & Burns, Duluth, for appellant.

Considered and decided by DAVIES, P.J., and PETERSON and FOLEY, JJ.


OPINION

DANIEL F. FOLEY,* Judge.

Appellant Brian Auge challenges the district court's jury instructions on right of way under Minn.Stat. § 169.20 (1996), arguing that the district court erred in deciding that the forfeiture provision of Minn.Stat. § 169.20, subd. 1 (1996) applies to the situation set forth in Minn.Stat. § 169.20, subd. 4 (1996). We affirm.

FACTS

On January 15, 1994, respondent...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases