1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. P.2d
  4. 949 P.2d
  5. 949 P.2d 38 (1997)
 

CITY OF TUCSON v. PIMA COUNTY

No. 2 CA-CV 97-0135.

949 P.2d 38 (1997)

190 Ariz. 385

CITY OF TUCSON, a municipal corporation, Plaintiff/Appellee, v. PIMA COUNTY, a body politic; Raul Grijalva, Mike Boyd, Ray Carroll, Sharon Bronson and Dan Eckstrom, as Members of the Pima County Board of Supervisors, Defendants/Appellants.

Court of Appeals of Arizona, Division 2, Department B.

October 28, 1997.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Barbara LaWall, Pima County Attorney by Katharina Richter, Tucson, for Defendants/Appellants.

Thomas J. Berning, City Attorney by Thomas J. Berning and Tobin Rosen, Tucson, for Plaintiff/Appellee.

Shelley & Bethea, P.L.C. by J. LaMar Shelley, Mesa, for Amicus Curiae, League of Arizona Cities and Towns.

OPINION

HOWARD, Judge.

Pima County appeals the trial court's judgment in favor of the City of Tucson, which declared that A.R.S. § 11-371 authorizes the County to issue Highway User Revenue Fund (HURF) revenue bonds for projects within incorporated areas of the County without restriction. We vacate the court's judgment.

The state collects fuel and vehicle taxes, vehicle registration and license fees, and other transportation-related revenues...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases