1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Pa.
  4. 549 Pa.
  5. 549 Pa. 169 (1997)
 

POTTSTOWN v. PENN. MUN. RETIREMENT

549 Pa. 169 (1997)

700 A.2d 1261

BOROUGH OF POTTSTOWN and Pottstown Police Pension Fund, Respondents, v. PENNSYLVANIA MUNICIPAL RETIREMENT BOARD a/k/a Pennsylvania Municipal Retirement System of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, Petitioner. Appeal of BOROUGH OF POTTSTOWN and Pottstown Police Pension Fund, Cross Petitioner.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.

September 30, 1997.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Letitia Ann Dyer, Asst. Counsel, for petitioner.

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 30th day of September, 1997 the petition for allowance of appeal is denied and the cross-petition for allowance of appeal is granted limited to the following issues:

I. "Did the Commonwealth Court correctly rule that the "excess interest" policies of the Pennsylvania Municipal Retirement Board are "interpretative rules" that did not have to be promulgated in accordance with the Commonwealth Documents Law?"...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases