1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.J.
  4. 304 N.J.
  5. 304 N.J. Super. 339 (1997)
 

VANDER WEERT v. VANDER WEERT

304 N.J. Super. 339 (1997)

WENDY VANDER WEERT, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. JEFFREY VANDER WEERT, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT, v. COHN LIFLAND PEARLMAN HERRMANN & KNOPF, ESQS., INTERVENOR-APPELLANT.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided September 25, 1997.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Albert L. Cohn argued the cause for appellant (Cohn Lifland Pearlman Herrmann & Knopf, attorneys; Mr. Cohn, of counsel and on the brief with Audra DePaolo).

Marvin H. Sunshine argued the cause for respondent Wendy Vander Weert (Sunshine, Atkins, Minassian & Tafuri, attorneys; Stephen A. Gallo, on the brief).

Respondent Jeffrey Vander Weert did not file a brief.

Before Judges PRESSLER, WALLACE and CARCHMAN.

PRESSLER, P.J.A.D.

Appellant Cohn Lifland Pearlman Herrmann & Knopf, Esqs. (Cohn Lifland), a New Jersey law firm, appeals from the denial of its post-judgment motion to intervene in this divorce case. We reverse the order denying the motion, and since the merits of appellant's legal position and claim for relief have been fully argued, we have opted to decide the question raised. We now dismiss appellant's application...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases