TOWN OF VALDESE v. BURKE, INC.

No. COA96-471.

482 S.E.2d 24 (1997)

TOWN OF VALDESE and Town of Rutherford College, Plaintiffs, v. BURKE, INC., Defendant.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

March 18, 1997.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Kuehnert & Ayers, P.L.L.C. by Daniel A. Kuehnert and James R. Ayers, Morganton, for appellant Town of Rutherford College.

Mitchell, Blackwell & Mitchell, P.A., by Marcus W.H. Mitchell, Jr., and Keith W. Rigsbee, Valdese, for appellee Town of Valdese.


EAGLES, Judge.

The dispositive issue here on appeal is whether, at the time the Town of Valdese purported to annex defendant Burke's property, the Burke property was "contiguous" to the Town of Valdese's then existing corporate limits within the meaning of G.S. 160A-31(f). We hold that it was not and accordingly reverse the order of the trial court.

G.S. 160A-31(a) allows the "governing board of any municipality [to] annex by ordinance any area contiguous...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases