1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.J.
  4. 150 N.J.
  5. 150 N.J. 191 (1997)
 

MATTER OF TORONTO

150 N.J. 191 (1997)

696 A.2d 8

IN THE MATTER OF PHILIP V. TORONTO, AN ATTORNEY AT LAW.

The Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Decided July 11, 1997.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Richard J. Engelhardt, Assistant Ethics Counsel, argued the cause on behalf of the Office of Attorney Ethics.

Raymond F. Flood argued the cause for respondent (Flood & Basile, attorneys).

PER CURIAM.

This disciplinary proceeding arises from a Motion for Final Discipline Based Upon a Criminal Conviction filed by the Office of Attorney Ethics ("OAE") before the Disciplinary Review Board ("DRB"). The OAE moves for final discipline of Philip Toronto ("respondent") pursuant to Rule 1:20-13(c)(2). It bases the motion on respondent's guilty plea to simple assault on his wife, contrary to N.J.S.A. 2C:12-1a(1). The conviction constitutes a violation...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases