1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.J.
  4. 148 N.J.
  5. 148 N.J. 89 (1997)
 

STATE v. MARSHALL

148 N.J. 89 (1997)

690 A.2d 1

STATE OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. ROBERT O. MARSHALL, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

The Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Decided March 5, 1997.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Judith L. Borman, First Assistant Deputy Public Defender and Joan D. Van Pelt, Deputy Public Defender, argued the cause for appellant (Susan L. Reisner, Public Defender, attorney; Ms. Borman, Ms. Van Pelt and Bernadette N. De Castro, Assistant Deputy Public Defender, on the briefs).

Robert E. Bonpietro and Paul H. Heinzel, Deputy Attorneys General, argued the cause for respondent (Deborah T. Poritz, Attorney General of New Jersey, attorney).

                    TABLE OF CONTENTS

  I. FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY ....................... 137

 II. THE INTERRELATIONSHIP OF POST-CONVICTION
      RELIEF, THE CAPITAL PUNISHMENT
      ACT, AND HABEAS CORPUS ............................ 143

III. LEGAL STANDARDS GOVERNING DEFENDANT'S
      CLAIMS ............................................ 154

 IV. THE MERITS OF DEFENDANTS PETITION FOR
      POST-CONVICTION RELIEF .............

                    
                    
                    

                        

                            

                                
                            

                            

                                

                                    
    
                                        
  1. 
                                        
  2. 
                                        
  3. 
                                    

                                

                                

                                    
Let's get started

                                

                                

                                    

                                    Leagle.com
                                    

                                    Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting 
                                    

                                        Sign on now to see your case. 
                                        

                                        Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
                                        

                                        
    
                                            
  • Updated daily.
    • 
                                            
  • Uncompromising quality.
    • 
                                            
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.
    •

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases