1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 977 F.Supp.
  5. 977 F.Supp. 1362 (1997)
 

ROZEMA v. THE MARSHFIELD CLINIC

Nos. 96-C-592-C, 96-C-916-C and 96-C-730-C.

977 F.Supp. 1362 (1997)

Henry and Joann ROZEMA, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs, v. THE MARSHFIELD CLINIC and Security Health Plan of Wisconsin, Inc., Defendants. Kathleen V. MALEK, State of Wisconsin Department of Health and Family Services, and Plaintiffs, v. THE MARSHFIELD CLINIC, Security Health Plan of Wisconsin, Inc., North Central Health Protection Plan, and Rhinelander Medical Center, S.C., Defendants. Harriet HALIDA, Lawrence Halida, Island Sports Center, Inc., a corporation, Mark McKay, and Town of Mercer Sanitary District # 1, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs, v. THE MARSHFIELD CLINIC, Security Health Plan of Wisconsin, Inc., North Central Health Protection Plan, and Rhinelander Medical Center, S.C., Defendants.

United States District Court, W.D. Wisconsin.

October 2, 1997.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Steven J. Schooler, Lawton & Cates, Madison, WI, for Henry Rozema.

Stephen E. Meili, Center for Public Representation, Madison, WI, for Joann Rozema.

Britt L. Tinglum, Keller Rohrback, L.L.P., Seattle, WA, for Harriett Halida.

Gerald W. Cook, O'Halloran, Kosoff, Helander, Geitner & Cook, P.C., Norhbrook, IL, for Kathleen Malek.

Richard Perkins, Asst. Atty. Gen., Madison, WI, for State of Wis. Dept. of Health and Human Services.

Steven J. Caulum, Bell, Metzner, Gierhart & Moore, Madison, WI, for The Marshfield Clinic and Security Health Plan of Wi., Inc.

Kevin D. McDonald, Jones, Day, Reavis & Pogue, Washington, DC, for the Marshfield Clinic.

John M. Loomis, Milwaukee, WI, for North Central Health.

Todd R. McEldowney, O'Melia, Schiek & McEldowney S.C., RHinelander, WI, for Rhinelander Medical.

Thomas W. Bertz, Anderson, Shannon, O'Brien, Rice & Bertz, Stevens Point, WI, for Rice Clinic(non-party).

ORDER AND OPINION

CRABB, District Judge.

This is a civil antitrust action for monetary, declarative and injunctive relief brought pursuant to the Sherman Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1, and Wis. Stat. §§ 133.03 and 133.14. Plaintiffs contend that defendants violated the federal and state statutes by entering into a continuing contract, combination or conspiracy to divide the market for all physician services within an eight-county area in north central...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases