1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 952 F.Supp.
  5. 952 F.Supp. 1265 (1997)
 

BARNETT v. CITY OF CHICAGO

Nos. 92 C 1683, 92 C 2104 and 92 C 2666.

952 F.Supp. 1265 (1997)

Richard BARNETT, et al., Plaintiffs, v. CITY OF CHICAGO, et al., Defendants, and Carole Bialczak, et al., Defendant-Intervenors. Mary BONILLA, et al., Plaintiffs, v. CITY OF CHICAGO, et al., Defendants, and Carole Bialczak, et al., Defendant-Intervenors.

United States District Court, N.D. Illinois, Eastern Division.

February 4, 1997.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Nathaniel R. Howse, Jr. Howse, Howse, Nevelle & Gray, Chicago, IL, R. Eugene Pincham, Chicago, IL, Philander Scott Neville, Jr., Chicago, IL for Richard Barnett.

MEMORANDUM OPINION

BRIAN BARNETT DUFF, District Judge.

In order for a court "to perform its high function in the best way, justice must satisfy the appearance of justice." In re Murchison, 349 U.S. 133, 136, 75 S.Ct. 623, 625, 99 L.Ed. 942 (1955). This general principle is embodied by the "catch-all" federal recusal statute, 28 U.S.C. § 455(a), which provides...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases