1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. P.2d
  4. 938 P.2d
  5. 938 P.2d 1134 (1997)
 

BILKE v. STATE

No. 1 CA-CV 96-0326.

938 P.2d 1134 (1997)

189 Ariz. 133

Mitchell Paul BILKE; Charles Roberts; Kenneth Ashelman; Felton Hale; Richard S. Berry; Mervin L. Davis; and Damon D. Fisher, individually and as members of a class, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. STATE of Arizona; ARCOR Enterprises, a subdivision of the state; Arizona Correctional Industries, a subdivision of the state; James Ricketts, former director of the Arizona Department of Corrections (DOC); Samuel Lewis, director of the DOC; Marilyn Wilkins, director of the Arizona Correctional Industries; Thomas Lescault, director of ARCOR; Tony West, David Tierney, Earl Cobb, Thomas Donnelly, Henry Evans, Marcus Englemen, Delbert Householder, and Ray Shaffer, members of the board of directors, ARCOR Enterprises, Defendants-Appellees. Larry Lynn HAMON, a single man, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. STATE of Arizona; Arizona Department of Corrections, a department of the State of Arizona; Samuel Lewis and Jane Doe Lewis, his wife; Marilyn Wilkens and John Doe Wilkens, her husband; Daniel Wilkins and Jane Doe Wilkins, his wife; ARCOR Enterprises, a division of the State of Arizona; Arizona Correctional Industries, a division of the State of Arizona, Defendants-Appellees. John COYLE; Jeffrey L. Wadsworth; and Saul Gonzales, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. STATE of Arizona, Defendant-Appellee.

Court of Appeals of Arizona, Division 1, Department E.

May 29, 1997.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Michael E. St. George, Tempe, for Plaintiffs-Appellants.

Grant Woods, Attorney General by Gordon S. Bueler and Sonia D. Overholser, Assistant Attorneys General, Phoenix, for Defendants-Appellees.

OPINION

KLEINSCHMIDT, Judge.

This case originates in a suit filed by current and former inmates against the State of Arizona, the Department of Corrections, ARCOR Enterprises, Arizona Correctional Industries, and various individuals named in their official capacities. We will refer to the defendants collectively as "the Department." The inmates claim that they should have been paid the minimum wage for work they did as part of the Department's industries...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases