1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.E.2d
  4. 679 N.E.2d
  5. 679 N.E.2d 1378 (1997)
 

INDIAN FARMERS MUT. INS. CO. v. ELLISON

No. 69A01-9610-CV-357.

679 N.E.2d 1378 (1997)

INDIANA FARMERS MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY, Appellant-Plaintiff, v. Opal ELLISON and Jennie Ellison Hawthorne, Appellees-Defendants.

Court of Appeals of Indiana.

June 6, 1997.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Charles T. Bate, Bate Harrold & Bate, Shelbyville, for Appellant-Plaintiff.

Scott A. Faultless, Schuerman Kelley & Craig, Batesville, for Appellee-Defendant Jennie Ellison Hawthorne.

Jack A. Shields, Batesville, For Appellee-Defendant Opal Ellison.

OPINION

BAKER, Judge.

In this appeal, we are asked to decide whether a homeowner's insurer is required to defend its insured for continually exposing a child to a child molester when the homeowner's policy excludes coverage for injuries which are expected or intended. Specifically, appellant-plaintiff Farmers Mutual Insurance Company (Farmers Mutual) contends it has no duty to defend appellee-defendant Opal Ellison because she expected or intended the injuries...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases