1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 958 F.Supp.
  5. 958 F.Supp. 1026 (1997)
 

CITY OF ROME v. GLANTON

Civil Action No. 96-5284.

958 F.Supp. 1026 (1997)

CITY OF ROME, et al., Plaintiffs, v. Richard A. GLANTON, et al., Defendants v. Francesco RUTELLI, et al., Third-Party Defendants.

United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania.

April 15, 1997.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

James E. Beasley, Michael A. Smerconish, Beasley, Casey and Erbstein, Philadelphia, PA, for Plaintiffs.

Robert J. Sugarman, Noreen O'Grady, Sugarman & Associates, Philadelphia, PA, Barbara W. Mather, Pepper, Hamilton & Scheetz, Philadelphia, PA, Samuel E. Klein, Amy B. Ginensky, Dechert, Price & Rhoads, Philadelphia, PA, for Defendants.

ORDER AND MEMORANDUM

KATZ, District Judge.

AND NOW, this 15th day of April, 1997, upon consideration of plaintiffs' and defendants' Motions for Summary Judgment, and the responses and replies thereto, and after a hearing, it is hereby ORDERED that the said motions are GRANTED.

I. Factual Background

While satellite disputes have not been lacking in the course of this litigation, the central dispute...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases