1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 955 F.Supp.
  5. 955 F.Supp. 979 (1997)
 

GRUEN MARKETING CORP. v. BENRUS WATCH CO., INC.

No. 96 C 7599.

955 F.Supp. 979 (1997)

GRUEN MARKETING CORPORATION, Plaintiff, v. The BENRUS WATCH COMPANY, INC., Hampden Watch Co., Inc., Irving Wein, Joseph Wein, and Jim Herbert, Defendants.

United States District Court, N.D. Illinois, Eastern Division.

February 27, 1997.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

James A. Cherney, Michael D. Smith, Latham & Watkins, Chicago, IL, for Plaintiff.

Barry S. Rosen, Andrew Hartman, James A. Rolfes, Sachnoff & Weaver, Ltd., Chicago, IL, for Defendants.

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

HART, District Judge.

Gruen Marketing Corporation ("Gruen") brings this action against defendants Benrus Watch Company, Inc. ("Benrus"), Hampden Watch Co., Inc. ("Hampden"), Irving Wein, Joseph Wein and Jim Herbert. Gruen alleges that defendants violated the Lanham Act, 15 U.S.C. §§ 1114, 1125(a), the Illinois Deceptive Trade Practices Act, 815 ILCS 510/2, the Illinois Consumer Fraud and Deceptive Practices Act...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases