HICKS v. WESTINGHOUSE MATERIALS CO.

No. 95-2314.

78 Ohio St.3d 95 (1997)

HICKS, APPELLANT, v. WESTINGHOUSE MATERIALS COMPANY; NLO, INC. ET AL., APPELLEES.

Supreme Court of Ohio.

Decided April 2, 1997.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Waite, Schneider, Bayless & Chesley Co., L.P.A., Stanley M. Chesley, Louise M. Roselle and Paul M. DeMarco, for appellant.

Frost & Jacobs, William H. Hawkins II and Jack B. Harrison, for appellee NLO, Inc.

Betty D. Montgomery, Attorney General, and William D. Haders, Assistant Attorney General, for appellees Administrator, Bureau of Workers' Compensation, and Industrial Commission of Ohio.


MOYER, C.J.

The question presented in this appeal is whether the trial court conducted a proper constitutional analysis as outlined in Batson v. Kentucky (1986), 476 U.S. 79, 106 S.Ct. 1712, 90 L.Ed.2d 69, in determining that appellees were not racially motivated in excluding an African American from the jury through the use of a peremptory challenge. Our review of the law and record...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases