GREAT ATLANTIC & PACIFIC TEA CO. v. IMBRAGUGLIO

No. 33, Sept. Term, 1996.

697 A.2d 885 (1997)

346 Md. 573

The GREAT ATLANTIC & PACIFIC TEA COMPANY, INC., et al., v. Ethel A. IMBRAGUGLIO, et al.

Court of Appeals of Maryland.

Reconsideration Denied September 5, 1997.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

David A. Skomba (Rudolph L. Rose, Erin M. Masson, Semmes, Bowen & Semmes, on brief), Baltimore, for Petitioner.

Eugene A. Shapiro (Darren L. Kadish, Jeffrey R. Moffet, Shapiro & Dorman, P.A., on brief), Baltimore, for Respondents.

Argued before BELL, C.J., and ELDRIDGE, RODOWSKY, CHASANOW, KARWACKI, RAKER and WILNER, JJ.


KARWACKI, Judge.

Under Maryland Code (1991 Repl.Vol., 1996 Supp.), § 9-509 of the Labor and Employment Article,1 colloquially dubbed the "exclusivity provisions" of Maryland's Workers' Compensation Act ("Workers' Compensation Act" or "the Act"), employers are immune, save for two exceptions, from suit by their employees for work-related injuries...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases