1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.2d
  4. 700 A.2d
  5. 700 A.2d 766 (1997)
 

R.D.H. COMMUNICATIONS, LTD. v. WINSTON

No. 96-CV-143.

700 A.2d 766 (1997)

R.D.H. COMMUNICATIONS, LTD., et al., Appellants, v. James L. WINSTON, et al., Appellees.

District of Columbia Court of Appeals.

Decided September 18, 1997.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

John K. Henderson, Jr., was on the brief for appellants.

Jack A. Gould, Washington, DC, for appellees. Aaron L. Handleman, Washington, DC, also entered an appearance for appellees.

Before SCHWELB and RUIZ, Associate Judges, and GALLAGHER, Senior Judge.

GALLAGHER, Senior Judge:

In this legal malpractice action, the clients (appellants) argue we should adopt the continuous representation rule in relation to the statute of limitations. Under such a rule, the statute of limitations on their claim would begin to run on the date their attorney (appellee) ceased to represent them in the specific matter in which he allegedly committed malpractice. We hereby adopt the continuous...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases