JEBOUSEK v. CITY OF NEWPORT

LUBA No. 96-107; CA A95330.

935 P.2d 452 (1997)

147 Or. App. 100

Nyla L. JEBOUSEK, Petitioner, v. CITY OF NEWPORT, Respondent.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Decided March 19, 1997.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Nyla L. Jebousek, pro se.

Elizabeth A. Fetsch and Minor & Boone, P.C., Newport, filed the brief for respondent.

Before DEITS, P.J., and De MUNIZ and HASELTON, JJ.


DEITS, Presiding Judge.

Petitioner Jebousek seeks review of LUBA's memorandum opinion, ORS 197.835(16), which affirmed without discussion the city of Newport's decision allowing a lot line adjustment that facilitates planned residential development on the affected property. Petitioner, who lives across the street from the property, makes a number of arguments, one of which requires a remand to LUBA. We write to address only that argument.

Petitioner contends...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases