1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. P.2d
  4. 957 P.2d
  5. 957 P.2d 341 (1997)
 

CITY OF TUCSON v. STATE

No. 2 CA-CV 97-0055.

957 P.2d 341 (1997)

191 Ariz. 436

CITY OF TUCSON, a municipal corporation, Plaintiff/Appellee, v. STATE of Arizona; Jane Dee Hull, in her official capacity as Secretary of State of Arizona, Defendants/Appellants.

Court of Appeals of Arizona, Division 2, Department B.

Reconsideration Denied December 2, 1997.

Review Denied June 2, 1998.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Thomas J. Berning, City Attorney by Catherine M. Shovlin and Dennis McLaughlin, Tucson, for Plaintiff/Appellee.

Grant Woods, Attorney General by Eryn M. McCarthy and Anthony B. Ching, Phoenix, for Defendants/Appellants.

OPINION

HOWARD, Judge.

Section 16-204, A.R.S., enacted in 1996, restricts elections held by political subdivisions to four specified dates during the year.1 The City of Tucson sued the State of Arizona, claiming that the statute is invalid as applied to the City because it conflicts with Chapter XVI of the Tucson City Charter. The trial court ruled in favor of the City, holding...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases