1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 982 F.Supp.
  5. 982 F.Supp. 190 (1997)
 

QUINN v. SHERWIN-WILLIAMS CO.

No. 96-CV705H.

982 F.Supp. 190 (1997)

Anne M. QUINN, Plaintiff, v. The SHERWIN-WILLIAMS COMPANY, Defendant.

United States District Court, W.D. New York.

November 5, 1997.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Michael Paskwitz, Buffalo, New York, for Plaintiff Borins, Halpern, Stromberg & Paskowitz.

Thomas S. Gill, Jason A. Yots, Buffalo, New York, for Defendant Saperston & Day, P.C.

DECISION AND ORDER

HECKMAN, United States Magistrate Judge.

In accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 636(c), the parties have consented to have the undersigned conduct all further proceedings in this case, including entry of final judgment. Both parties have moved for summary judgment, pursuant to Rule 56 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. For the reasons that follow, plaintiff's motion is denied, and defendant's motion is granted.

BACKGROUND...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases