1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 986 F.Supp.
  5. 986 F.Supp. 158 (1997)
 

EVE OF MILADY v. IMPRESSION BRIDAL, INC.

No. 96 CIV. 8893(SAS).

986 F.Supp. 158 (1997)

EVE OF MILADY and Milady Bridal, Inc., Plaintiffs, v. IMPRESSION BRIDAL, INC., and Nick Yeh, Defendants.

United States District Court, S.D. New York.

July 17, 1997.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Robert C. Faber, Marc Lieberstein, Ostrolenk, Faber, Gerb & Soffen, LLP, New York, NY, for Plaintiffs.

Sharon P. Carlstedt, Reid & Priest, LLP, New York, NY, C. Steven McDaniel, Jeff A. McDaniel, Conley, Rose & Taylon, Houston, TX, for Defendants.

OPINION AND ORDER

SCHEINDLIN, District Judge.

Appearing before me for the second time in four months, plaintiffs Eve of Milady and Milady Bridal, Inc. seek a second preliminary injunction pursuant to Rule 65 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure restraining defendants from infringing their copyrights and trademarks, and engaging in unfair competition. Defendants argue, inter alia, that they have not unlawfully copied plaintiffs' lace designs...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases