1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 964 F.Supp.
  5. 964 F.Supp. 168 (1997)
 

HYMAN COMPANIES, INC. v. BROZOST

Civil Action No. 97-269.

964 F.Supp. 168 (1997)

THE HYMAN COMPANIES, INC., Plaintiff, v. Michael E. BROZOST, et al., Defendants.

United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania.

March 12, 1997.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Sandor Engel, Allentown, PA, Steven A. Bergstein, Hyman, Engel, Wiener and Bergstein, Allentown, PA, for the Hyman Companies, Inc.

Joseph Wolfson, Stevens & Lee, Reading, PA, for Michael E. Brozost, Erwin Pearl, Inc., Erwin Pearl, Inc. Premium Sale, Erwin Pearl Retail, Kuzmann Chain Co., F.O. Inc.

MEMORANDUM

GAWTHROP, District Judge.

This is a difficult case. It goes to the very heart of a lawyer's ethics: the continuing and sacrosanct duty of fidelity to a client, versus the right to be emancipated from that client and to go off to do lawyering elsewhere. The subtle tugs and tensions between that duty and that right raise questions that are particularly knotty.

Before the court is Plaintiff's Motion for a Preliminary Injunction. Plaintiff...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases