1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 986 F.Supp.
  5. 986 F.Supp. 133 (1997)
 

ROSENTHAL A.G. v. RITELITE, LTD.

95-CV-0765 (CBA).

986 F.Supp. 133 (1997)

ROSENTHAL A.G., Plaintiff, v. RITELITE, LTD., Defendant.

United States District Court, E.D. New York.

September 5, 1997.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Charles LaPolla (argued), Robert C. Faber, Gregory A. Rutchik, Ostrolenk, Faber, Gerb & Soffen, New York, NY, for plaintiff.

Howard Schneider, New York, NY, for defendant.

MEMORANDUM & ORDER

AMON, District Judge.

INTRODUCTION

On November 14, 1996, this Court heard oral argument on plaintiff's motion for summary judgment pursuant to Rule 56(c) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Plaintiff brings this action for trademark infringement, false designation of origin, and false representations in violation of the Lanham Act, 15 U.S.C. §§ 32 and 43(a); as well as for common law unfair competition...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases