1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 973 F.Supp.
  5. 973 F.Supp. 124 (1997)
 

ACRISON, INC. v. SCHENCK CORP.

No. 94 CV 3505(NG).

973 F.Supp. 124 (1997)

ACRISON, INC., Plaintiff, v. SCHENCK CORPORATION, Defendant.

United States District Court, E.D. New York.

July 24, 1997.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Charles W. Bradley, Bradford S. Breen, Tzvi Hirshaut, Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP, New York City, James D. Fornari, Law Offices of James D. Fornari, New York City, for Plaintiff.

Peter F. Felfe, John E. Lynch, Andrew L. Tiajoloff, Felfe & Lynch, New York City, for Defendant.

OPINION AND ORDER

GERSHON, District Judge.

This patent infringement action alleges that Schenck Corporation ("Schenck") has infringed two patents held by Acrison, Inc. ("Acrison") for a type of "loss-in-weight" feeder system. Basically, a loss-in-weight feeder system is a mechanism for discharging a liquid or powder from a hopper at a steady rate. The systems are particularly useful in the pharmaceutical...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases