The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed, without costs, and the certified question answered in the affirmative. The central argument urged on this appeal — that the Industrial Code provisions relied upon by plaintiff are too general to support a cause of action under Labor Law § 241 (6) (see, Ross v Curtis-Palmer Hydro-Elec. Co.,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
ELEZAJ v. P.J. CARLIN CONSTR. CO.
89 N.Y.2d 992 (1997)
679 N.E.2d 638
657 N.Y.S.2d 399
Akija Elezaj, Also Known as Sadro A. Elezaj, Respondent-Appellant, v. P.J. Carlin Construction Company et al., Defendants, and F & V Mechanical Plumbing & Heating Corp., Respondent, and Todino Sewer & Water Service, Inc., Appellant-Respondent. (And Third-Party Actions.)
Court of Appeals of the State of New York.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
Argued February 6, 1997.
Decided March 20, 1997.
Attorney(s) appearing for the Case
Coen & Geoghan, P. C., Brooklyn (
Klar, Piergrossi & Nunez, New York City (
Kelly & McGlynn, New York City (
Chief Judge KAYE and Judges TITONE, BELLACOSA, SMITH, LEVINE, CIPARICK and WESLEY concur in memorandum.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
- No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.