1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 984 F.Supp.
  5. 984 F.Supp. 85 (1997)
 

ORANGE IMPROVEMENTS PARTNERSHIP v. CARDO, INC.

No. 3:97 CV 661(GLG).

984 F.Supp. 85 (1997)

ORANGE IMPROVEMENTS PARTNERSHIP, Plaintiff, v. CARDO, INC., Defendant.

United States District Court, D. Connecticut.

November 6, 1997.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

John K. Atticks, III, Marlowe, Snow & Atticks, Madison, CT, for Plaintiff.

John J.L. Chobor, Greenberg, Hurwitz, Cooper & Silverman P.C., New Haven, CT, for Defendant.

OPINION

GOETTEL, District Judge.

Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 56, plaintiff Orange Improvements Partnership moves for summary judgment on the issue of the liability of defendant, Cardo, Inc. For the reasons discussed below, plaintiff's motion (Document # 12) is DENIED.

BACKGROUND

Plaintiff, Orange Improvements Partnership ("Orange Improvements"), owns a shopping center in Orange, Connecticut known as the Orange...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases