1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 920 F.Supp.
  5. 920 F.Supp. 35 (1996)
 

ASHTON v. CAFERO

No. 3:95cv663.

920 F.Supp. 35 (1996)

Heinke P. ASHTON, Plaintiff, v. Deputy Sheriff Lawrence F. CAFERO, et al., Defendants.

United States District Court, D. Connecticut.

March 18, 1996.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Heinke P. Ashton, Washington, CT, Pro Se Plaintiff.

Marcia J. Gleeson, Sack, Spector & Barrett, West Hartford, CT, Michael J. Lanoue, Attorney General's Office, Hartford, CT, for Defendant, Lawrence F. Cafero.

Henry S. Cohn, Attorney General's Office, Hartford, CT, for Defendant, Deborah Lieman.

Mark F. Katz, Stamford, CT, Pro Se Defendant.

Mark F. Katz, Stamford, CT, for Defendant, John F. Ashton.

Elliot B. Spector, Karyl Carrasquilla, Sack, Spector & Barrett, West Hartford, CT, for Defendant, Westport Police Department.

Ronald D. Japha, Gordon & Scalo, Bridgeport, CT, for Defendant, Gordon & Scalo, P.C.

RULING ON PENDING MOTIONS TO DISMISS

DORSEY, Chief Judge.

Plaintiff, pro se, claims violations of 42 U.S.C. §§ 1983 and 1985 and the Connecticut Constitution, as well as intentional infliction of emotional and physical distress stemming from the seizure of certain items from her home pursuant to a state court order. All defendants move to dismiss the complaint.

I. BACKGROUND FACTS

On October 15, 1991, the Connecticut...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases