1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 922 F.Supp.
  5. 922 F.Supp. 29 (1996)
 

AERO-MOTIVE CO. v. U.S. AEROMOTIVE, INC.

No. 4:94-CV-175.

922 F.Supp. 29 (1996)

AERO-MOTIVE COMPANY, Plaintiff, v. U.S. AEROMOTIVE, INC., Defendant.

United States District Court, W.D. Michigan, Southern Division.

March 22, 1996.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

David G. Boutell, Flynn, Thiel, Boutell & Tanis, Kalamazoo, MI, James J. Hill, Emrich & Dithmar, Chicago, IL, for plaintiff.

Randall G. Litton, Price, Heneveld, Cooper, Dewitt, et al., Grand Rapids, MI, for defendant.

OPINION

QUIST, District Judge.

This is an action by Aero-Motive Company against U.S. Aeromotive, Inc. for false designation of origin, trade name, and service mark infringement and dilution of trade name under the Trademark (Lanham) Act of 1946, as amended, 15 U.S.C. §§ 1051, et seq., and for unfair competition under the common law of Michigan. Count IV of the complaint seeks injunctive relief for dilution of plaintiff's trade name...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases