1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 916 F.Supp.
  5. 916 F.Supp. 23 (1996)
 

HOUSMAN v. BARATZ

Civil Action No. 93-2107.

916 F.Supp. 23 (1996)

William HOUSMAN, Plaintiff, v. Max BARATZ, Major General U.S. Army, Office of the Chief, Army Reserve, Defendant.

United States District Court, D. Columbia.

February 20, 1996.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

James Klimaski, Washington, DC, for Plaintiff.

Charles Flynn, Asst. U.S. Atty., for Defendant.

ORDER

URBINA, District Judge.

Adopting the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation and Granting Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment

In the above-captioned action, plaintiff claims that he was unlawfully separated from the Army. He contends that he was fully qualified for continued active duty service. According to Mr. Housman, the Army had no authority to select him for non-continuation. Defendant...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases