SULTAN v. STATE BD. OF EXAMINERS

No. 9426SC70.

468 S.E.2d 443 (1996)

121 N.C. App. 739

Faye Ellen SULTAN and Brad Fisher, Plaintiffs, v. STATE BOARD OF EXAMINERS of PRACTICING PSYCHOLOGISTS, Defendant, and The North Carolina Psychological Association, Defendant-Intervenor/Counterclaimant.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

March 5, 1996.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Lesesne & Connette by Edward G. Connette, Charlotte, for plaintiff appellee.

Tharrington, Smith & Hargrove by Ann L. Majestic and Marcus W. Trathen, Raleigh, for defendant-intervenor/counter-claimant appellant.

Fuller, Becton, Billings & Slifkin, P.A. by James C. Fuller and Mary Ann Tally, Raleigh, for North Carolina Academy of Trial Lawyers, amicus curiae.


JOHN, Judge.

The North Carolina Psychological Association (NCPA) appeals the trial court's entry of summary judgment in favor of Dr. Faye Ellen Sultan (Sultan), permanently enjoining NCPA from requiring Sultan to disclose information regarding one of her patients. We affirm the trial court.

Relevant factual and procedural information is as follows: In 1989, an individual denominated for purposes of the instant proceeding as "Patient K" (K) filed a civil action...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases