1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.J.
  4. 291 N.J.
  5. 291 N.J. Super. 608 (1996)
 

BOYD v. CONRAIL

291 N.J. Super. 608 (1996)

677 A.2d 1182

LEVAR BOYD, A MINOR, BY HIS NATURAL PARENTS AND GUARDIANS AD LITEM, DOROTHY BOYD AND FREDERICK BOYD, AND DOROTHY BOYD AND FREDERICK BOYD, IN THEIR OWN RIGHT, PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS, v. CONRAIL, JOHN DOE PROPERTY OWNER AND JOHN DOE TRAIN OPERATOR, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided July 2, 1996.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Robert A. Porter argued the cause for appellant (Friedman, Bafundo & Porter, attorneys; Mr. Porter, on the brief).

William B. Scatchard, Jr. argued the cause for respondent (Capehart & Scatchard, attorneys; William B. Scatchard, of counsel; Mr. Scatchard, Jr. and Alison M. Nissen, on the letter-brief).

Before Judges SHEBELL and DREIER.

The opinion of the court was delivered by SHEBELL, P.J.A.D.

Plaintiff, Levar Boyd, a minor, and his parents, Dorothy Boyd and Frederick Boyd, filed this tort action against defendant, Consolidated Rail Corporation (Conrail), alleging that Levar sustained personal injuries on defendant's property as a result of defendant's negligence, and that plaintiffs, as parents, were forced to expend large sums of money to care for their son's injuries. Conrail filed its answer...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases