1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.J.
  4. 292 N.J.
  5. 292 N.J. Super. 513 (1996)
 

CALHANAS v. SOUTH AMBOY ROLLER RINK

292 N.J. Super. 513 (1996)

679 A.2d 185

MANUEL CALHANAS AND DINA CALHANAS, HIS WIFE, PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS, v. SOUTH AMBOY ROLLER RINK, D/B/A ROLLER MAGIC, JOHN DOE (A FICTITIOUS NAME), PETER POE (A FICTITIOUS NAME), AND ABC CORP. (A FICTITIOUS NAME), DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided July 24, 1996.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Kenneth W. Elwood argued the cause for appellants (Blume, Goldfaden, Berkowitz, Donnelly, Fried & Forte, attorneys; Mr. Elwood, on the brief).

Nicholas A. Giuditta, III, argued the cause for respondents (Mr. Giuditta, on the brief).

Before Judges KING, LANDAU and HUMPHREYS.

The opinion of the court was delivered by KING, P.J.A.D.

This case involves the "New Jersey Roller Skating Rink Safety and Fair Liability Act," N.J.S.A. 5:14-1 to -7; L. 1991, c. 28, effective February 19, 1991. The injured plaintiff Manuel Calhanas, and his wife, Dina Calhanas, who brought a derivative action, appeal from a summary judgment in favor of South Amboy Roller Rink (Roller Magic). Manuel Calhanas claimed that he was seriously injured while...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases