1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Ariz.
  4. 186 Ariz.
  5. 186 Ariz. 600 (1996)
 

RIVERA v. CITY OF PHOENIX

No. 1 CA-CV 95-0217.

186 Ariz. 600 (1996)

925 P.2d 741

Daniel RIVERA, a single man, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CITY OF PHOENIX, a political subdivision of the State of Arizona, Defendant-Appellee.

Court of Appeals of Arizona, Division 1, Department D.

Review Denied October 21, 1996.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Law Offices of Matthew R. Gould, P.C. by Matthew R. Gould, Scottsdale, for Plaintiff-Appellant.

Roderick G. McDougall, Phoenix City Attorney by Edward P. Reeder, Assistant City Attorney, Phoenix, for Defendant-Appellee.

OPINION

KLEINSCHMIDT, Judge.

Daniel Rivera appeals from the denial of his request for a residential zoning variance. We affirm the denial because we find that Rivera did not have a vested right in the change to his home, that his request for a variance was properly denied, and that the City of Phoenix is not estopped from enforcing its zoning code.

Rivera's residence is located in an area where the zoning code limits the square foot-age of improvements...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases