SHERWOOD CT. v. SOUTH RIVER BOR.


294 N.J. Super. 472 (1996)

683 A.2d 839

SHERWOOD COURT, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. BOROUGH OF SOUTH RIVER AND SOUTH RIVER ELECTRIC CO., DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS. GRANDE ASSOCIATES, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. BOROUGH OF SOUTH RIVER AND SOUTH RIVER ELECTRIC CO., DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided October 28, 1996.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

John A. Stone argued the cause for appellants Sherwood Court and Grande Associate (Cohn & Cohn, attorneys; Mr. Stone, of counsel and on the brief).

Thomas C. Roselli argued the cause for respondents Borough of South River and South River Electric Co. (Roselli & Roselli, attorneys; Mr. Roselli, of counsel and on the brief).

Before Judges DREIER and NEWMAN.


The opinion of the court was delivered by NEWMAN, J.A.D.

Plaintiffs Grande Associates and Sherwood Court (hereinafter collectively referred to as plaintiffs) own apartment complexes in South River. Tenants of the complexes receive electricity from defendant South River Electric (SRE), a utility company owned by the municipality, the defendant Borough of South River. Prior to receiving electric service, tenants are required to complete a request form and place a deposit...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases