1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.2d
  4. 675 A.2d
  5. 675 A.2d 77 (1996)
 

DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA v. TARLOSKY

Nos. 94-CV-1269 & 95-CV-376.

675 A.2d 77 (1996)

DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, Appellant, v. Rudolph TARLOSKY, et al., Appellees.

District of Columbia Court of Appeals.

Decided May 9, 1996.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Martin B. White, Assistant Corporation Counsel, with whom Charles F.C. Ruff, Corporation Counsel, and Charles L. Reischel, Deputy Corporation Counsel, were on the brief, for appellant.

Robert E. Deso, Washington, for appellees.

Before WAGNER, Chief Judge, SCHWELB, Associate Judge, and KERN, Senior Judge.

SCHWELB, Associate Judge:

The Superior Court granted summary judgment to appellees, who are retired members of the Metropolitan Police Department (MPD), with respect to their claim that a legislatively approved 4.2% increase in the salaries of active members of the MPD, denominated a "retention allowance," entitled appellees ("retirees") to a corresponding 4.2% increase in the retirement payments pursuant to the "equalization" provision of the District of Columbia...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases