1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Ohio
  4. 75 Ohio
  5. 75 Ohio St.3d 556 (1996)
 

STATE v. FOSTER

No. 95-2631.

75 Ohio St.3d 556 (1996)

THE STATE OF OHIO, APPELLEE, v. FOSTER, APPELLANT.

Supreme Court of Ohio.

Decided June 5, 1996.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mark C. Fleegle, Muskingum County Prosecuting Attorney, for appellee.

William H. Foster, pro se.

Per Curiam.

We affirm the judgment of the court of appeals, since appellant has failed to demonstrate "a genuine issue as to whether * * * [he] was deprived of the effective assistance of counsel on appeal." App.R. 26(B)(5).

Judgment affirmed.

MOYER, C. J., DOUGLAS, RESNICK, F. E. SWEENEY, PFEIFER, COOK and STRATTON...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases