1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.J.
  4. 291 N.J.
  5. 291 N.J. Super. 283 (1996)
 

NAT. WASTE RECYCLING v. MIDDLESEX CTY. IMP. AUTH

291 N.J. Super. 283 (1996)

677 A.2d 268

NATIONAL WASTE RECYCLING, INC., PLAINTIFF, AND JOHN GRYWALSKI, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. THE MIDDLESEX COUNTY IMPROVEMENT AUTHORITY, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT, AND WASTE MANAGEMENT OF NORTH JERSEY, INC., DEFENDANT. NATIONAL WASTE RECYCLING, INC., PLAINTIFF, AND JOHN GRYWALSKI, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. THE MIDDLESEX COUNTY IMPROVEMENT AUTHORITY, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT, AND WASTE MANAGEMENT OF NORTH JERSEY, INC., DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided June 17, 1996.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Jonathan L. Williams argued the cause for appellant (A-6428-94T2) and respondent (A-6503-94T2) Middlesex County Improvement Authority (DeCotiis, Fitzpatrick & Gluck, attorneys; Mr. Williams, of counsel; Benjamin Clarke and Andrew Bayer, on the brief).

Robert S. Moraff argued the cause for appellant (A-6503-94T2) Waste Management of North Jersey, Inc. (Schwartz, Tobia & Stanziale, attorneys; Mr. Moraff, of counsel and on the brief).

Steven D. Weinstein argued the cause for respondent (A-6428-94T2) John Grywalski (Blank, Rome, Comisky & McCauley, attorneys; Mr. Weinstein, on the brief).

Regina H. Nugent, Deputy Attorney General, argued the cause for amicus curiae Division of Local Government Services and Department of Environmental Protection (A-6503-94T2) (Deborah T. Poritz, Attorney General of New Jersey, attorney; Andrea M. Silkowitz, Assistant Attorney General, of counsel).

Before Judges PRESSLER, KEEFE and A.A. RODRIGUEZ.

The opinion of the court was delivered by KEEFE, J.A.D.

Defendant Middlesex County Improvement Authority (MCIA) and defendant Waste Management of North Jersey, Inc. (Waste Management) appeal from the entry of summary judgment in favor of plaintiff John Grywalski holding that Grywalski had standing to challenge the legality of a contract entered into between MCIA and Waste Management, and further holding that the contract was in violation of the Local Public Contracts...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases