1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.J.
  4. 288 N.J.
  5. 288 N.J. Super. 250 (1996)
 

STATE FARM MUT. AUTO. INS. CO. v. CROCKER

288 N.J. Super. 250 (1996)

672 A.2d 226

STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. EILEEN CROCKER, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided March 8, 1996.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Warren F. Sperling argued the cause for appellant (Bennett, Bricklin & Saltzburg, attorneys; Catherine M. Mikus, on the brief).

Louis J. DeVoto argued the cause for respondent (Ferrara & Rossetti, attorneys; Mr. DeVoto, on the brief).

Before Judges HAVEY, D'ANNUNZIO & BRAITHWAITE.

The opinion of the court was delivered by HAVEY, P.J.A.D.

The issue raised by this appeal is a narrow one. Is defendant, a nonresident insured under an out-of-state automobile policy, who was injured in a New Jersey accident, entitled to binding arbitration of a dispute over personal injury protection (PIP) benefits available to her by virtue of New Jersey's so-called "deemer" statute, N.J.S.A. 17:28-1.4? We conclude that she is entitled to arbitrate the dispute...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases