1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.J.
  4. 291 N.J.
  5. 291 N.J. Super. 234 (1996)
 

PETAK v. CITY OF PATERSON

291 N.J. Super. 234 (1996)

677 A.2d 244

HERBERT PETAK AND ANITA PETAK, PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS, v. CITY OF PATERSON, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided June 13, 1996.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Donald J. Maizys, Fair Lawn, argued the cause for appellants (Karas, Kilstein, Hirschklau, Feitlin & Youngman, attorneys; Mr. Maizys, of counsel and on the brief).

Alan L. Stein, Paterson, argued the cause for respondent (Susan E. Champion, attorney; Mr. Stein, of counsel and on the brief).

Before Judges BAIME, VILLANUEVA and KIMMELMAN.

The opinion of the court was delivered by VILLANUEVA, J.A.D. (Retired and temporarily assigned on recall.)

Plaintiffs appeal from an order granting a cross-motion for summary judgment in favor of the City of Paterson (City) dismissing plaintiffs' complaint and denying plaintiffs' motion for summary judgment. We reverse.

After Aram Calfayan purchased two tax sale certificates for property located in Paterson, New Jersey, he assigned them to plaintiff Anita...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases