1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.J.
  4. 292 N.J.
  5. 292 N.J. Super. 174 (1996)
 

MATTER OF N.J. TURNPIKE AUTHORITY

292 N.J. Super. 174 (1996)

678 A.2d 726

IN THE MATTER OF NEW JERSEY TURNPIKE AUTHORITY, PETITIONER-RESPONDENT, AND LOCAL 194, IFPTE, AFL/CIO-CLC, RESPONDENT-APPELLANT.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided July 11, 1996.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Bennet D. Zurofsky argued the cause for appellant (Reitman Parsonnet, attorneys; Mr. Zurofsky, on the brief).

Frank R. Campisano argued the cause for respondent (Schwartz, Tobia & Stanziale, attorneys; Mr. Campisano and Jill A. Tobia, on the brief).

Robert E. Anderson, General Counsel for the Public Employment Relations Commission, filed a statement in lieu of brief.

Before Judges PRESSLER, WEFING and KOLE.

The opinion of the court was delivered by KOLE, J.A.D. (retired and temporarily assigned on recall).

The issue in this case concerns the authority of the New Jersey Turnpike Authority (Authority) to negotiate with a union of its employees with respect to a decision as to employee layoffs. Is such a decision a matter of managerial prerogative which may not be negotiated, pursuant to such cases as State v. State Supervisory...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases